Sometimes, democracy works. It worked last month with proposed changes to business rates in Scotland. Independent assessors recalculated what each business would be charged. Since it had been seven years since the last review it was no surprise that some would see big changes.
Two thirds of local businesses saw no increase or a cut but some were facing dramatic eye-watering hikes in their rates. The hospitality trade – hotels, pubs and restaurants – seemed to be worst affected. Business owners contacted their local political leaders in anger and panic. They feared, rightly, that the scale of the increases could put them under.
Councillors and Members of Parliament got involved, taking up the case of businesses in their areas. And last week the Scottish Finance Secretary, Derek Mackay, stepped in to limit increases to 12.5%. Problem identified. Representation made. Action taken. Case solved. If only it happened that way all the time.
The Scottish Government’s intervention means Porty pubs and Tollcross taverns can breathe a sigh of relief. It creates a breathing space to consider how changes in rateable values can be phased in. It also means that we can all take a look at how the organisation in charge of the process, the Lothian Valuation Joint Board, does its business. From my investigations I’m pretty sure that part of the problem is out of date methods leading to out of date results.
I’ve always thought there’s a logical simplicity to the idea of rates. Edinburgh is worth a certain amount and we all own a share of it, no matter how small. So in deciding how to fund the city it seems fair to allocate costs to each of us according to how much of it we own. So far, so good. But this only works if the way we calculate value is fair and transparent.
The Valuation Board assume that a reasonable estimate of the value of a property is the rent it would fetch on the property market. That might be true in the city centre where most property is leased but that’s just not the case in other areas. The growth in bars, cafes and restaurants in places like Portobello and Leith Walk in the last 20 years hasn’t come from corporations and franchises expanding. It’s been the result of individuals taking a risk on setting up a business. Usually, ploughing their savings into buying and developing a property.
In areas where most businesses are owner occupied its plain daft to base their value on the minority of rented places. Worse, if some of these rented properties are owned by large pub companies driving up rents by contract rather than market price, it makes it look like values are increasing when they are not.
In some cases, particularly with pubs, the Board base value on turnover. But as anyone who has run a business will tell you there’s a world of difference between turnover and profit – a busier pub doesn’t necessarily mean you are making more. And if you set up a business in an area because rates are low only to find they get hiked if you make a success of it, it sort of defeats the purpose.
If we are going to base charges on value then maybe what a place costs to buy would be fairer.
However value is calculated, we need to take account of ability to pay. That’s why transitional relief should assist people facing huge increases. The Scottish Government have just offered the mother of all transitional relief schemes – but rightly it’s a temporary measures. Now the challenge falls to the city council to make things fairer in years to come.
Article first published in Edinburgh Evening News - 2nd March 2017
Going back to Westminster after the summer recess you can almost feel the impending doom in the air. It’s the calm before the storm. Everyone knows something bad is going to happen. Just not what exactly. Like waiting for the ghoul to reveal itself in a horror movie.
And as the dread unfolds the discussion about whether there should be another Brexit referendum will intensify.
We need to talk about democracy. The UK government recently hosted its first ever “National Democracy Week” – with no sense of irony.
We absolutely should be celebrating the 90th anniversary of the equalisation of voting ages for men and women. Nobody would argue with that.